![](\"http:\/\/i182.photobucket.com\/albums\/x287\/brainsmatter\/audio.jpg\")
Download MP3 of Ep 131<\/a><\/p>\nPlease vote for this podcast this month at
\n![\"PodcastAlley.com](\"http:\/\/www.podcastalley.com\/images\/podcastalley_icon.gif\"){kind=icon}
<\/a><\/p>\n
In Brains Matter’s continuing series on science communication, I talk to Steve Mirsky, a journalist and author, editor at Scientific American, and podcast host about various aspects of science communication and the perception of science in the public. Topics we discuss include:<\/p>\n
– Steve’s background
\n– The changing view of science by the public
\n– Stereotypes of scientists
\n– The modern take in television and movies of a scientist
\n– Gilligans Island
\n– Sports v Science
\n– Perceptions of the Nobel Prize
\n– Various strategies to get people interested in science
\n– The IgNobel Prizes
\n– The differences in science being communicated in print and through new media
\n– Some fun science stories
\n– How do we get children more interested in science at a younger age?
\n– What is a science story?
\n– The false objectivity of non-science media when they report on science stories
\n– A discussion on climate change as an example
\n– The reliance people have on science and engineering
\n– The funding of science compared to other areas due to a lack of political will and public apathy
\n– Some great science communicators<\/p>\n
Today’s listener of the episode is Joshua Weisskopf.<\/p>\n
This is part 1 of an interview with Steve – keep an eye out for part 2 in the next episode.
\n(Keep an ear out for an out-take from this episode!)<\/p>\n
Please vote for this podcast this month atDownload MP3 of Ep 131<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"Donate](\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/en_US\/i\/btn\/x-click-but04.gif\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/i182.photobucket.com\/albums\/x287\/brainsmatter\/iTunesWord.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/i.creativecommons.org\/l\/by-nc-nd\/2.5\/au\/88x31.png\")
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"