![](\"http:\/\/i182.photobucket.com\/albums\/x287\/brainsmatter\/audio.jpg\")
Download MP3 of Ep 132<\/a><\/p>\nPlease vote for this podcast this month at
\n![\"PodcastAlley.com](\"http:\/\/www.podcastalley.com\/images\/podcastalley_icon.gif\"){kind=icon}
<\/a><\/p>\n
In Brains Matter\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s continuing series on science communication, I continue my talk with Steve Mirsky, a journalist and author, editor at Scientific American, and podcast host about various aspects of science communication and the perception of science in the public. <\/p>\n
This is part 2 of the discussion. If you haven’t listened to part 1, please go back and listen to episode 131.<\/p>\n
Topics we discuss include:<\/p>\n
– the impact of science communication
\n– where podcast listeners are located
\n– the increased number of science communicators
\n– where science communication has inspired people
\n– why do kids lose interest in science within schools?
\n– how do we influence kids to have a positive view of science?
\n– how does opportunity and influence affect this?
\n– the wonder of libraries
\n– Steve’s path into science
\n– OG’s path into science
\n– The impact of good teachers on interest in science
\n– The relationship between art and science
\n– How some sciences can lead into other types of science interests<\/p>\n
Today’s listener of the episode is Bruce Wallace from Australia.<\/p>\n
(Keep an ear out for an out-take from this episode!)<\/p>\n
Please vote for this podcast this month atDownload MP3 of Ep 132<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"Donate](\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/en_US\/i\/btn\/x-click-but04.gif\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/i182.photobucket.com\/albums\/x287\/brainsmatter\/iTunesWord.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/i.creativecommons.org\/l\/by-nc-nd\/2.5\/au\/88x31.png\")
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"